The MSOP...

The MSOP...
FEAR BASED STRESS BOX Click on pic of MSOP!

Friday, September 20, 2013

Brad Stevens SCAP Phase II

Brad Stevens Phase II 9/20/2013 

Panel 1: CJ Smith, J Asphaug, J Metzen (Ret)

Brad Ronald Stevens (Pictured):
Ryan Magnus/Jen 
State: AGO-Steve Alpert, DA: Steve Betcher/Erin 


The Following Blog Post and Accompanying Notes are from someone HCAO John Kirwin alleged is a severely mentally disordered "sex offender". Think about that before you even think about suggesting that the State has been responsible in identifying the highest risk. That is a sick joke. 

Just go the DOC Website's Level 3 List in the community/on the streets, and you will see that John Kirwin, Mark Ostrem, and the rest of the COUNTY ATTORNEYS AS WELL THE LAWYERS FROM THE AGO ASSIGNED TO THESE CASES HAVE ALL GROSSLY ABUSED THEIR DISCRETION AND BETWEEN THEM AND TOM ROY/BILL DONNAY'S CRACK CREW IN THE DOC RISK ASSESSMENT, THEY HAVE DEMONSTRATED INCOMPETENCE, POOR JUDGMENT, and extremely POOR IMPULSE CONTROL IN RESISTING PETITIONING LOW RISK SEX OFFENDERS LIKE MY CLIENTS BRAD STEVENS, AND JOSHUA COX.

NOTE I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY, BUT I HAVE A CONSULTATION BUSINESS IN WHICH BRAD STEVENS AND MR. COX' GUARDIAN AD LITEM ARE MY CLIENTS:

www.SVPConsultation.com was my Original Domain Name for my business, and The Good Lord led me to own www.MinnesotaSexOffenderProgram.com POETIC JUSTICE? ROFL...:))

I DO NOT TRY TO FILE LEGAL PLEADINGS NOR DO I PRETEND TO BE AN ATTORNEY OR TRY TO PRACTICE LAW. I'M NOT ALLOWED TO DO THAT AS I AM NOT A LAWYER.

I LIKE TO USE THE TERM OF COURTESY: Here is one online Definition:

ESQUIRE: A title applied by courtesy to officers of almost every description, to members of the bar, and others. No one is entitled to it by law, and, therefore, it confers, no distinction in law.

     2. In England, it is a title next above that of a gentleman, and below a knight. Camden reckons up four kinds of esquires, particularly regarded by the heralds: 1. The eldest sons of knights and their eldest sons, in perpetual succession. 2. The eldest sons of the younger sons of peers, and their eldest sons in like perpetual succession. 3. Esquires created by the king's letters patent, or other investiture, and their eldest sons. 4. Esquires by virtue of their office, as justices of the peace, and others who bear any office of trust under the crown.

MERRIAM-WEBSTER STATES ESQUIRE IS DEFINED AS:

3
—used as a title of courtesy usually placed in its abbreviated form after the surname <John R. Smith, Esq.>



The Task Force tonight spent a considerable amount of time tonight engaged in discussing which is the lesser of two evils: County Attorneys having the authority to push forward petitions, even if a "Screening Panel" recommends against commitment, or the Attorney General's Office. 

The Task Force fundamentally misunderstands that you can trust neither to do what is Constitutional,  Ethical, Moral, or Legal. John Kirwin himself told the Minnesota Supreme Court in Oral Argument in the Linehan Case 20+ years ago that it WAS THE COURT'S DUTY TO REIGN IN OVERZEALOUS, UNETHICAL PROSECUTORS LIKE HIM AND ALL THE REST OF THEM AT THE DA LEVEL OR AGO IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. THEY ARE ALL CORRUPT AND HAVE ABUSED THE STATUTES TO THE POINT THAT WE ARE HERE NOW. 

THE COURTS ARE EVEN MORE RESPONSIBLE, AS AFTER KIRWIN CHALLENGED THEM 20 years ago, THEY HAVE NOT HAD THE COLLECTIVE CHARACTER OR INTEGRITY TO UPHOLD THEIR OATHS. THEY HAVE PANDERED TO JOHN KIRWIN, MATTHEW FRANK, AND THE REST OF THEM. 

THE DEFINITION OF INSANITY IS REPEATING THE SAME BEHAVIOR YET EXPECTING DIFFERENT RESULTS. THIS IS WHAT THE TASK FORCE IS DOING BY RELYING ON THE LIKES OF KIRWIN AND OSTREM (Who actually stated tonight that HE SEES NO PROBLEMS WITH THE WAY THE CURRENT SEX CIVIL COMMITMENT SCREENING PROCESS IS CONDUCTED. HALF THE ROOM LAUGHED OUT LOUD AT THAT ASININE  COMMENT, INCLUDING THE SEX CIVIL COMMITMENT PROSECUTORS FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY (Kirwin/Couri) seated behind me in my and my Dad's usual location.

DONNA DUNN, THE VICTIM ADVOCATE SAID IT BEST. SHE SAID SEXUAL ABUSE/ASSAULT VICTIMS DON'T WANT REVENGE WITH PUNITIVE LIFE SENTENCES TO MSOP.

SHE SAID THAT THE COUNTY ATTORNEYS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, AND THE DISTRICT COURTS, AND APPELLATE COURTS HAVE ALL DONE A SHAMEFUL DISSERVICE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, TO THE MSOP "CLIENT-PATIENTS" (HosPrisoners) AND TO THE VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ABUSE/ASSAULT THEMSELVES! Donna Dunn couldn't have said any words that were more disparaging to the State Prosecutors and Judges.

Donna Dunn had the courage to tell them they've FAILED THE VICTIMS!!!

SHE SAID OUT LOUD IN PUBLIC WHAT I'VE SAID SINCE I DISCOVERED THIS SORDID, ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL SDP/SPP Gang GOVERNOR PAWLENTY, KIRWIN, OSTREM AND OTHER POWERFUL "STAKEHOLDERS" SET UP FOLLOWING BILL DONNAY, DWIGHT CLOSE, THERESA LEVERENTZ, & THE REST OF TOM ROY'S "WORLD CLASS" Risk Assessors WHO LET ALFONSO RODRIGUEZ OUT TO ABDUCT, RAPE, TORTURE AND MURDER DRU SJODIN.

I CALLED THIS OUT IN MY MAYBE 2 MINUTES CHAIR MAGNUSON GENEROUSLY ALLOWS ME EVERY MEETING I ATTEND.

SPEAKING OF ATTENDANCE, IT WAS DEPLORABLE. HALF THE "Task Force" HAS DROPPED OUT OF THESE MEETINGS. NO SIGN OF JUDGE NELSON, WHO TOOK MY ADVICE: STAY HOME. YOU'RE SLEEPING IN THE MEETINGS YOU'RE AT AND YOU COMMITTED EVERY MAN WHO APPEARED BEFORE YOU. YOU STATED 700 IS A SMALL NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN MSOP. WE GET YOUR IDEA OF JUSTICE.

HARRINGTON DIDN'T BOTHER TO SHOW.

TONY LOURY NO SHOW. WHERE WAS LOURY'S "BOLD LEGISLATION" HE PROMISED THE FAMILIES.

JIM ABELER. NO SHOW AGAIN. LIED IN PUBLIC ABOUT WRITING BILL TO MOVE ALL DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED...ABOUT 100 people TO LESS RESTRICTIVE ALTERNATIVES.

DR. KAPLAN NOT THERE TONIGHT BUT HE HAS BEEN VERY RESPONSIBLE WITH HIS ATTENDENCE, AS HAS HEAD SHERIFF JIM FRANKLIN. I LIKE AND RESPECT EACH OF THEM, AS WELL AS DOC COMMISSIONER TOM ROY WHO WAS ABSENT BUT BEEN AT EVERY OTHER MEETING I RECALL AS DR. KAPLAN AND SHERIFF FRANKLIN have.

AFTER 10 1/2 years, they have finally proposed legislation to address the "Deadly Gap" as I've dubbed it of the actually DANGEROUS HIGHEST SEX OFFENDERS (LIKE RODRIGUEZ) would be subject to much longer Monitoring/Supervision in the Community, which I proposed to Governor Pawlenty, The BCA, Sheriff Stanek, Patty Wetterling, and many other State and National figures on December 30, 2003:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/1.30.03%20DRU_SJODIN_PREVENTABLE.pdf

They proposed 25-Year Conditional Release periods vs 10, but fail to recognize or understand that REPEAT SEX OFFENDERS ARE SUBJECT TO LIFETIME CONDITIONAL RELEASE NOW. I still believe that voluntary or involuntary GPS TRACKING FOR LIFE IS THE ROUTE TO GO FOR THE TRUE WORST OF THE WORST, WHICH CURRENT STATE OFFICIALS HAVE PROVED THEMSELVES INCOMPETENT AND UNABLE TO IDENTIFY CORRECTLY.
THIS IS PART OF WHY I CONTINUED TONIGHT TO URGE THIS PANEL TO TAKEUP THE OFFER OF MY COLLEAGUES ON THE SOCDA LISTSERVE I AM ON WITH I BELIEVE DEAN JANUS AND ABOUT 500 of the top SVP PEOPLE IN THE NATION ON THE FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH SIDE AND THE DEFENDING OF THESE EXTREMELY COMPLICATED CASES.

I TOLD THIS TASK FORCE AND DHS COMMISSION JESSON A YEAR AGO THAT THERE ARE 7 OUT-OF-STATE NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED EXPERTS (Psychologists experienced with SVP RISK ASSESSMENTS) FROM OUR NEIGHBORING IOWA (LUIS ROSELL), WISCONSIN (DIANE LYTTON), ILLINOIS (KIRK WITHERSPOON) MICHIGAN (TERRANCE CAMPBELL) FLORIDA (DEAN CAULEY), CALIFORNIA (BRIAN ABBOTT) OREGON (RICH WOLLERT)) .

 MN STATE OFFICIALS ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED WITH SEX CIVIL COMMITMENT DECISIONS! IT'S THAT SIMPLE. SANITY, NOT INSANITY.

USE THESE 7 EXPERTS IN 2 Panels of 3 with one alternate . I either make it unanimous or 2-1 for commitment with these REAL EXPERTS, AND OUR SYSTEM WILL BE MORE FAIR AND MUCH IMPROVED.


The Brad Stevens "Phase II" Hearing was very interesting. My Dad wasn't feeling up to going (he accompanied me to support Brad at the initial hearing) so I drove down there by myself
I got to the Courtroom at about 1:20 and the State proceeded to call Dr, Jennifer Jones to the witness stand. When I had previously reviewed her Risk Assessment of Brad previously, a number of errors jumped out at me and it was clear she lacked adequate training in this area of the law where mental health and the law converge...Forensic Psychology. I may or may not submit my written review of Dr. Jones' Risk Assessment(s) in this case for the Court to consider. I will have to discuss with Brad.
In person, I was struck by the young age of Ms. Jones, considering the gravity of the work she was responsible for. Indeed, it turns out from her testimony that she has only been licensed a little over a year! She conducted her Internship at MSOP, so she has no professional experience or training outside of MSOP after college. The absurdity and dangerous recklessness in having someone so "Green" doing every one of the HosPrisoner's Risk Assessments is classic MSOP. They know that no one ever gets out, so they hire a young kid fresh out of school, give her an Internship and then the Keys a year later. Her "Supervisor", Dr. Lauren Allen, looks only a few years older than Dr. Jones. Neither of these people are seasoned, experienced Risk Assessors, with the requisite educational backgrounds, training, work experience, life experience that should be required for these positions.
Dr. Jones testified that she is "not involved in Treatment." I challenge that testimony as untruthful.

Dr. Jones' Record Review was of a very limited nature. It was the negative, inculpatory information she reviewed (and focused on) as opposed to the positive, exculpatory information she ignored.
She is using a Dynamic Risk Assessment Tool called the Stable-2007, which is not to be used in SVP Civil Commitment Hearings, let alone a Discharge hearing. The literature is clear that this is in error. Dr. Jennifer Jones doesn't have anywhere near the knowledge I possess, and her erroneous use of the Stable-2007 shows this fact. There's a reason the State is using the Stable, and it's not to provide the Court a clear picture of who Brad Stevens is. Not by a long shot. More to come on that later...

The two MSOP Psychologists were asked by Dr. Gilbertson, the Court's "Independent" Examiner/Expert, whether either one of them (Dr. Jennifer Jones and/or Dr. Lauren Allen knew of ANY EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD WHICH SUGGESTS MR. STEVENS DOES NOT HAVE ANY STRANGER VICTIMS. DR. JONES IMMEDIATELY SAID TO DR. GILBERTSON, "No. I'm not aware of any.". "Supervisor" Lauren Allen didn't say a word.

I witnessed this lie (x2) and went across the Courtroom Gallery to inform Dr. Gilbertson of what Dr's Jones and Allen, Lucinda Jesson, Anne Barry, Nancy Johnston, Janine Hebert, Tom Lundquist, and all of the other Usual Suspects have perpetrated this FRAUD on THE SCAP PANEL THAT THEY NOTHING OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD TO EVEN SUGGEST STEVENS HAS NO STRANGER VICTIMS.

WELL ROBIN VUE, AND THE REST OF YOU: THERE IS GOOD REASON THE DOC STAFF CALLED ME JOHNNY COCHRAN: Here's what this False State Label is putting before the SCAP:

I have concluded an additional review of the two (2) Court Commitment Orders: Initial and Indeterminate.
At the Initial Findings of Facts at Pg. 26, it references Dr. Linderman's Finding that Brad's "Victim Pool" is "Acquaintances". At Pg. 34, it reads:

"Linderman testified that she found it significant that Stevens has not acted out against strangers with respect to lack of control."

At the Indeterminate, on Page 3 at "6.", it references that MSOP determined "at least one of [Stevens] victims is a stranger."

It goes on to state on Page 4 at "11.", it states as a Finding of Fact:

"Bruce Stewart, the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP) psychologist who was involved in Stevens' Initial Assessment testified at the Review Hearing. Stewart testified that the Risk Factor regarding one of Stevens' victims being a Stranger would not apply in Stevens' case, and that he believed that the inclusion of that as one of Stevens' Risk Factors was a mistake."

I hope this helps to firm up in the negative the very crucial issue of whether Mr. Stevens has ever had a victim which would meet the requisite St-99R criteria for being a Stranger Rape.

CC: Client: Brad Ronald Stevens, Esq.
      File

Cordially,
Thomas Evenstad
www.MinnesotaSexOffenderProgram.com
www.SVPConsultation.com
www.SportsBoxers.com
www.SupportBoxers.com

It is outrageous, shameful and tragic that Commissioner Jesson and MSOP are opposing Low Risk Sex Offender Brad Ronald Stevens, Esquire's Discharge by lying to the Court (at least by Omission) that Brad is a "Stranger" Rapist, and that MSOP is NOT RESPONSIBLE under Minn. Stat. 253b.185 Subd. 19 "Aftercare Services" for all things Supervision, and the Dire Concerns regarding the "DISSERVICE TO SEND HIM TO COMMUNITY W/o Transition" that Dr. Jones testified to is present is ameliorated by the "World Class" "Treatment" and "Reintegration" Specialists who should be scrambling right about...NOW! to ensure that Nancy (or her designee) are moving Heaven and Earth to Prepare the Way for One Sex Offender Crying In the Wilderness. Lol

Seriously, Brad and I will hold Nancy accountable on this issue. She is to submit her plan well before the next Hearing to ensure the SCAP Tribunal that Mr. Stevens' needs will indeed be met under this Subdivision which is State Law:

Subd. 19.Aftercare services.


The Minnesota sex offender program shall provide the supervision, aftercare, and case management services for a person under commitment as sexual psychopathic personalities and sexually dangerous persons discharged after July 1, 1999. The designated agency shall assist with client eligibility for public welfare benefits and will provide those services that are currently available exclusively through county government.

Prior to the date of discharge or provisional discharge of any patient committed as a sexual psychopathic personality or sexually dangerous person, the head of the treatment facility or designee shall establish a continuing plan of aftercare services for the patient, including a plan for medical and behavioral health services, financial sustainability, housing, social supports, or other assistance the patient needs. The Minnesota sex offender program shall provide case management services and shall assist the patient in finding employment, suitable shelter, and adequate medical and behavioral health services and otherwise assist in the patient's readjustment to the community.


Dr. Jones then told the 3 Judges her Decision as Factfinder:

She told the Judges that the

"STATUTORY CRITERIA IS NOT MET AS HE HASN'T COMPLETED TREATMENT"!!! Lol

I nearly busted out laughing when she said that and I saw the Judges understandably recoil.








POST IN PROGRESS


SEE MY NOTES BELOW

1:30 Jennifer Lynn Jones
Assessment Psychologist: Writes Risk Evals
Dr. Lauren Allen Head of the Risk Assessment
Not Involved in Tx
Focus on Risk Assessments for SRB
BACHELORS
MASTERS
PHD Alliant Intl University
Licensed Little over a year
Internship w MSOP
Supervisor reviewed updated report Exhibit 11
Provide SRB AND ULTIMATELY SCAP with Risk Assessments
Record Review
Tx Doc
Past
St-99r
Stable 2007
Hare PCL-20
Progress in Tx
Institution Records
Interviewed
2012 first report no interview
2013 second w interview

Wrote  her opinion before reviewing JG Rpt

What is her view on Full Discharge?

Pg 17 of 19

Nominal high risk
Needs Tx
Must be in Secured Facility

At Risk wo Tx
Explains Static-99R

Prior Scores
Reidel and Jones
5 Moderate-High
Current Opinion re Score 5

Moderate-High

Explains Stable 2007

12 on Stable
Lowest 0
Highest 24

0-3 low
4-11 mod
12+ High

PCL-R/Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised:
Dr. Jones: "Several Different Factors": DOESNT EVEN KNOW PCL-R has 2 Factors, and 4 Facets: Astounding.

AXIS I
JJ DX: Paraphilia NOS
ALC CON
COCAINE
AXIS II
PD NOS W/antisocial and narcissistic features
BEST PRACTICES-Used DSM-IV
Reviewed Gilbertson
Gil DX:  USED DSMV Pg8 Paraphilic Disorder NOS REPLACED W SPECIFIED
ACCOUNTING FOR NON CONSENT
RAPE DISORDER Paraphilic Coercive Disorder:
REJECTED BY DSM PSYCH JUNK SCIENCE: MAGNUS DOESN'T CHALLENGE! WHY? I told him at Break about the raging DSM-V controversy over this and it soundly defeated as Junk Science-Rejected by DSM-V...Magnus throwing case??? Ineffective Asst of Counsel.

ALSO WHY MAGNUS NOT CHALLENGE STRANGER OR AFTERCARE SERVICES MSOP????

Incompetent or INTENTIONALLY THROWING CASE.

THIS IS THE ATTY ON THE TASK FORCE STATING THE LAWYERING IS SUBPAR. I AM DEFENDING STEVENS DESPITE RYAN MAGNUS. WTF...FOR REAL...POOR BRAD!!!

Good thing I am looking out for Brad by Supervising his attorney's very lacking performance at the Phase II hearing. Dr. Riedel is not pleased that Ryan Magnus did not make arrangement for him to attend the hearing. He stated he would've spent his own time without even asking to be paid by the SCAP for his time if Ryan had even just arranged airfare from Florida.

Brad Stevens and I are both concerned over his lawyer's advocacy. He has over 130 men in MSOP and a very lucrative gig going, but I personally like Ryan, and simply don't understand how he missed every important point it seems for his client on 9/20/13.



ATTACK THIS WITH DSM 5 Evidence

MAGNUS
FOC Records
Never offered Tx in DOC
MADE REQUEST TO DO TX AT MSOP FROM DOC
TOLD DECISION BY DOC HAD TO DO EXPIRATION
RETURNED TO DOC W TX DIRECTIVE
REQUESTED TX NEVER OFFERED
REVIEWS? Great reports No Discipline since 2006
Considered for Stable 2007 Pg 14 of 19 Hx of non cooperation no known violations
2006 Rule Violations
15 Years No Violations
Evaluate Dynamic Risk
Fluency in reading Historical problem in this area
Strict custody
In community and in prison

5 is associated w 25.2 5 years; 10 years
High Risk/High Needs Group
Not to be used with Sex CC

Not aware of Doubling the 5-Year St99
50% by a doubling of 5 year risk estimate
Is 50% Highly Likely under the law? In re Ince 2-1  75% REQUIRED

would Tx matter w normative group
15.9 5 Years
32%
Probably Ok w discharge if Tx completed

Does Tx for Intimacy reduce risk in community: What studies back that up? No releases
Above Average
THINKING ERRORS

Hostility Toward Females

Insufficient
Deviant Sexual Preference Pg 14

Aware of challenges to at least one victim
Establishes a pattern of acting on some deviant non consent
Deviance: Rape Non-Consent

Basis for Deviant
Stable Item
Stable 2007 Scoring of 1 or more victims score in this area
Tx Participation could help him reduce
12 and above high
No opinion change if he was in
STATUTORY CRITERIA NOT MET AS HE HASN'T COMPLETED TREATMENT
DISSERVICE TO SEND HIM TO COMMUNITY W/o Transition


***STATUTE REQUIRES COMMISSIONER TO PREPARE ALL THINGS RELEASE** 253B Emailed you and Commissioner on this.

Protective Factor no major mental illness? He offended. Pathetic

Sex Offender and Chemical Dependency Tx
Imperative CD Tx
no opportunity DOC
no DOC records use of drugs
Coping
Risk Re Age
Brad is 46 or 47

DOESN'T KNOW THE RESEARCH
FIGHTS MAGNUS ON rapist less risk than child molesters
Not greatly reducing risk at 46
Doesn't change risk that he has had no chance to do Tx

Scoring appropriate in this case
PCL-r Not a great factor. It exists. Doesn't increase his risk.
Dr Reidel needs treatment
Controls over him w Full Discharge ISR
NONE ON HIM
ISR  12 months to Supervise
1 year of Outpatient Tx
Great risk to public after year of outpatient without secured Tx
Adult Females his Victim Pool
Degree of violence and gaining control
Deviant Sexual Category looks at number of victims
3 Acts of violence is 1
Several more victims to get to 2

Linderman scored St 99, not 99R
Reidel 5

SRV-Sv Doesn't meet widely accepted
Risk Assesors MN Best Practices
No Opinion Change
GILBERTSON 2:51 pm
James Harlan Gilbertson
Exhibit 13 15 pg Report September 16, 2013
Attached Addendum
Methodology: retained by commissioner for INDEPENDENT REVIEW
NO CLINICAL INTERVIEW
REVIEWED JJ & Reidel Reports and Reidel Testimony
Interview critical to belief systems, how he thinks, etc. clinical interview
Limitations w/o Interview
Responses, Impressions, how,did it enhance etc
JJ: Did not inquire into areas I'm concerned about.
DX Tools: Examined prior risk assessments, Converge of data, Discrepancies, Precision of Diagnosis
NO INDEPENDENT RATING ON ANY RISK ASSESSMENT ACTUARIALS
NO st 99r
NO STRANGER VICTIMS
+1 to 0
2-yr Questions
0 or 1
Static 3-5!!!
st99r of +3 with High Risk High Need Group

5 yr 15.8
10 24.3
Lifetime 31%

1.39% over average w 3
25.3 w 5 years
2.70 % over average w 5
Why no Full Discharge
Clinical Facts
Not LEGAL FACT FINDERS...That's JENNIFER JONES' JOB
NOT SUPPORT DISCHARGE AT THIS TIME.
STATUTORY CLINICAL FINDINGS
NOT AGREE BRAD CAN DO OUTPATIENT
RELEASED WO ISR
TX WOULD BE VOLUNTARY DISMA TRACK RECORD


JJ & JG:
HIGH RISK HIGH NEED GROUPING WAS IN ERROR
HIGHER BASE RATE

ERROR ON STATIC COULD CHANGE HIS OPINION

LOOKING AT LIFETIME RISK UNDER THE CIVIL COMMITMENT STATUTE



MNSOST 3.1 4 Years

31.6% Highly Likely? Won't answer dodges

Increased or deceased based on other factors, IE CLINICAL Judgment other ACTUARIALS


SRA-FV Reliable. Mandatory in CA

WHICH SAMPLE GROUP

STABLE 2007 Not Appropriate for SEX OFFENDER CC

SRA-FV plus St99 gives you #
Reidel scoring puzzled him

Confused whether combining with MNSOST 3.12 or St 99
And don't know if this combo has been studied.

Transcript GET COPY

PG 26-27

Not entirely clear how Reidel used SRA-FV
Commentary concerns pg 27 lengthy report
Several incomplete records No evidence of violence in either sexual assault
ZERO ON SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE
ANY EVIDENCE
STRUCK THE VICTIM HELD DOWN THREATS DURING
DISAGREE W REIDEL RE SEXUALIZED FORCE
MORE SUBJECTIVE THAN ACTUARIALS
RAISE BEYOND SIMPLE CLINICAL JUDGMENT

REIDEL  in Preselected for Tx need as a 5 is 15.9 % 31.8%
Highly Likely Based not on just ACTUARIALS
Presence of active CD

Study shows no treatment benefit

Treatment Completion no effect on risk
Termination from Tx does
Doug Epperson found
Partial Tx can help per Literature Protective Factor
JJ 1 yr of successful participation outpt Tx no risk reduction--Not Protective
Epperson vs Jennifer Jones
Expert vs Intern/Novice

No persons in MNSOST 3.21
124-134 excluded from the study
None in study under civil commitment action

does static 99 use civilly committed people
Takes issue with Reidel
NOT IN ALL CASES WHO ARE MOST DANGEROUS
BECAUSE OF LABEL!!!
Yes a different person than the released Level 3 Risk Level

5 year 9. With Static 3
19% Lifetime

That scoring would help him w lower risk tier
NEED FOR CONTINUED INPT
CAN HE DO TX GIVEN HIS LEGAL STATUS?
Points to Stewart
MSOP works from Formal Record
Work within context of 5th Amendment Rights
Could do MSOP W/O Admitting
Understands Stevens' concerns
Don't believe long term incarceration reduces him, but aging will re ST99r
Rapists highest risk  20s drops off at 35-40
St99 groups all together
Anger Rapist
Higher
High score on PCL2      27 Linderman 23 Reidel
25  is high loading of Psychopathy
Could enjoy lower because of anger rapist
PCL-R
Because of lack of treatment  records that are not here.
Capacity to adjust to open society
No DX to suggest can make it
Not Homeless
Good family support
Good work history
Capacity to return in the community in a safe way?
No
No if he is 3
Exhibit 10 Reidel
Formal Record: Extreme Violence
DX at 28:
Same DX as Reidel
No SEXUAL DEVIANCY
NO TRUE PARAPHILIA
DOES NOT HAVE PARAPHILLIC
NO PARAPHILIA NOS
SEXUAL ABUSE OF ADULT
NO SEXUAL DEVIANCY THAT WOULD QUALIFY FOR PARAPHILIA
ANTISOCIALLY INCLINED CAN CAUSE SEXUAL AGGRESSION
REIDEL NO SEXUAL VIOLENCE
1 gives you higher number, 2 higher yet
ZERO OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE
1 would bring more risk, 2 considered violent would raise risk (Needs 3 violent)
ATTITUDES, BELIEFS, ETC: CALL WITNESSES, ME OTHERS
NO SUPERVISION IF TAKEN TO EXPIRATION
DOESN'T REDUCE RISK TERMINATION
BOTTOM LINE: Not meet criteria

Inpatient Tx Y
Risk to Public Y
secured Tx Y
MSOP GOOD Y

State Rests

Magnus?
Scoring of Static99R

BRUCE STEWART MSOP STATED RECORDS ARE ERRONEOUS RE STRANGER



















Sent from my iPad

No comments:

Post a Comment