The MSOP...

The MSOP...
FEAR BASED STRESS BOX Click on pic of MSOP!

Monday, September 30, 2013

Discharges: MSOP or ME?

Look at who MSOP thinks are good candidates to join your neighborhood based on "Treatment":

1) John Rydberg: 100+ Victims
2) Clarence Opheim: 29+ Boy Victims
3) Kirk Fugelseth: 31+ Children (Boys & Girls Ages 3-14): The district court applied the Blodgett factors in reaching its conclusion that Fugelseth has an utter lack of power to control his sexual impulses and meets the criteria of an SPP. 

The district court noted that Fugelseth had committed approximately 200 acts of sexual misconduct, ranging from indecent exposure to oral and anal intercourse, against a large number of male and female victims ranging in age from three to 14; that he facilitated much of the abuse through grooming behavior and much of the misconduct occurred when he was in a position of trust or authority over the victims; that psychological evaluations indicate that Fugelseth's attitude toward his misconduct has been characterized by feelings of entitlement, lack of remorse, minimization and denial; that he continued to offend while he was subject to therapeutic and punitive consequences of previous convictions for sexual misconduct; that he continued to place himself in situations where sexual misconduct could occur; that he has never exhibited a period of real control over his behavior; and that he continues to experience deviant arousal
.
It's a disturbing and troubling story out of the Twin Cities involving a convicted sex offender with ties to heinous crimes in Moorhead: http://www.wday.com/event/article/id/85699/

Fugelseth has admitted to molesting more than 30 boys and girls from ages 3 to 14. In 1997, he admitted that he had been molesting his girlfriend's 9-year-old daughter for months after he moved to Moorhead, records show. His first sex crime conviction followed a 1993 charge for sexually molesting two boys in Oregon. In 2003, Clay County asked the court to have him civilly committed, claiming he was a danger to the community...
Fugelseth, 47, admitted that he sexually victimized more than 30 children starting when he was 14. For more than two decades, he would gain the trust of children with gifts and favors over time, and then violate them, court records show. He held a position of authority over many of his victims and he continued to reoffend even when he was on probation or receiving treatment for past sexual offenses, records show.

Forty-seven year-old Kirk Fugelseth has been recommended for release from Minnesota's most secure treatment program, the Minnesota Sex Offender Program in St. Peter and Moose Lake. He admitted to molesting more than 30 boys and girls between the ages of 3 to 14.

In 1997, he said he'd been molesting his girlfriend's 9 year old for months, after he moved to Moorhead. Clay County Court asked the court to have him civilly committed because he was a danger to the community.

If approved, Fugelseth would be one of only three men released from the program, which is facing pressure to prove it's not a lifetime sentence. The release is up to the Supreme Court Appeal panel.



4) Thomas Duvall: Duvall was convicted of raping a 17-year-old Brooklyn Park girl at knife point in 1987 just after completing a prison term for a separate rape conviction, records show.

Duvall, now 57, was living in a Minneapolis halfway house in 1987, when one day after Christmas, he coaxed a Brooklyn Park teenager into letting him into her apartment, saying he needed to use the telephone. Records show he tied her to a bed and terrorized her for more than three hours, sexually assaulting her with a hammer and a curling iron.

ME:

1) Brad Stevens: Three (3) Adult Acquaintance He-Said/She-Said Cases with No Physical Evidence, Rape Kit, or other credible evidence  supporting rape claims.

2) Joshua Cox: 69 IQ/DD

3) Orlando Lindgren: Severely Disabled/Wheelchair Bound: http://books.google.com/books?id=v7ZJIgkYhkcC&pg=PT52&lpg=PT52&dq=orlando+lindgre+mn&source=bl&ots=RvLcIW2_V-&sig=0vsn3anwkd-uB7RCB9kTf_sNtoY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vms7UZjPMcPVyQG1hIHwDQ&ved=0CD8Q6AEwAjgK#v=onepage&q=orlando%20lindgre%20mn&f=false

http://msopgulag.blogspot.com/2013/03/orlando-lindgren.html

http://msopgulag.blogspot.com/2013/03/walterfritz-mondale-alerted.html

POST IN PROGRESS!!!


Sen. Michelle Bachmann

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/Sen_MichelleB0001.pdf

Saturday, September 28, 2013

True Freedom: The Grateful Dead

Saturday, September 28, 2013


True Freedom: Grateful Dead

Thomas Evenstad (Heineken in Hand), Pictured Left Outside Alpine Valley Music Theatre--1987 Summer Tour with Grant Rallis Facing, Tom Quenroe Back to Cameraman: Chris Briggs 

I saw the Grateful Dead about 60 times from 7/10/81 St. Paul to 7/9/95 Soldier Field, Chicago, Il. which wound up sadly being Jerry's last show.

If you've ever been touched by Jerry Garcia's music and/or that of the Grateful Dead, please do tell: www.BeenJerified.com www.BeenJerryfied.com

The World can get happier and healthier also once I get www.Jerrycise.com together.

Finally, if you love Bobby Weir of the grateful dead, Stay Tuned for my new website www.WeirEveryWhere.com

The State of Minnesota unjustly stole my FREEDOM. While I had my liberty, I enjoyed attending Grateful Dead Concerts like this one I was at on July 19, 1989 at Alpine Valley Music Theatre in East Troy, WI.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OekWK7LorMw

Jerry Garcia described the experience as the last "Frontier" in America, and Bill Walton described The Grateful Dead Concert experience best: "A Celebration of Life."

Here's the link to perhaps the most incredible "Morning Dew" the Grateful Dead ever played:

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nkjGMUjaSmA 3/24/86 Philadelphia, PA Spectrum: Home of Dr. J

I was at this show as part of the Spring Tour I was attending, which included a 3-Show run in Hampton, Virginia 3/19-21/86. Here's the Second Set from 3/21/86...a little rough but Classic Dead!

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3Lj-yELmPic

Here's links to a 3-Show run I attended in Las Vegas, NV on May 29-31, 1992:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_s8hFix_dc
"Black-throated Wind":
What's to be found, racing around,
You carry your pain wherever you go.
Full of the blues and trying to lose
You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=g4DfEWMUhpA
"Jack Straw"
We used to play for silver
Now we play for life
One's for Sport
And one's for blood at the point of a knife

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5RfkJhv-53M
"Scarlet Begonias"
Once in a while you get shown the light
In the strangest of places if you look at it right

Strangers stopping strangers, just to shake their hand
Everybody's playing in the Heart of Gold Band








I've experienced the bliss of Freedom/Liberty and the abyss of False Imprisonment.
HERE'S WHAT I HAD ON THE WALL OF EVERY JAIL/PRISON/MSOPrison I RESIDED IN:

MSOPrisoner Chris Krych's Blog

Please make a Donation Today to Help END POLITICAL PRISONER CHRIS KRYCH'S ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL PUNITIVE PUNISHMENT McTREAMENT AT THE MSOP:

http://chriskrych.blogspot.com/2011/03/stop-rape-in-mn-msop.html

CA To Discharge SVP

http://eastcountymagazine.org/node/14074

Friday, September 27, 2013

Guardian: MSOP A "Gulag"

My attorney, colleague and friend Peter Erlinder coined the Term "Gulag" to describe the Draconian MSOP way back in 1993:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/Erlinder%201993%20Gulag.pdf

Peter Erlinder was also the person who called out in 1993 (20 years ago) the clear Constitutional Violation in refusing Respondents in SDP/SPP Cases their Right to a Jury Trial:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/Erlinder_Jury_SVP.pdf



http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/26/civil-commitment-sex-

A timely article from The Guardian examining the merits of Sexual Civil Commitment in the US, and reaching the same conclusion that James Rosenbaum and I both arrived at:

Eliminate the MSOP GULAG!!!

Here is the Article's Conclusion:

While there are, undoubtedly, some irremediable sex offenders who need to be confined for reasons of public safety, the civil commitment protocol denies some of the basic rights afforded other criminal defendants. These include the right to a speedy trial, full right to counsel and, perhaps most importantly, the right to introduce testimony from a defendant's own experts. Without the protection of this last right, some defendants are sent off to prison for an indefinite sentence on the basis of questionable opinions from the state's expert witnesses.
Civil commitment for sex offenders needs to be reformed root-and-branch or abandoned.


The policy may be popular in law enforcement circles, fewer than half of US states have such laws.

But in those states that have it, Baughman is the rare exception; most do not escape this largely invisible American gulag.


How 'civil commitment' enables indefinite detention of sex offenders

Many sex offenders are held indefinitely past their sentence on a recidivism assessment that's almost impossible to challenge
A prison cell door
Galen Baughman fought his civil conviction and won, but most aren't so lucky. Photograph: Charles O'Rear/Corbis
Most people would think that once you have served a jail sentence, you are free to go. But that's not always the case.
When it comes to sex offenders, a number of states and the federal government have laws that allow them to keep you in jail, simply because they consider you a potential recidivist. Through a legal procedure called "civil commitment", you can be classed as a sexually violent predator based solely on the subjective opinion of a state-employed psychologist or sex expert.
Once placed under a civil commitment, you are essentially in prison indefinitely. This can quickly become a nightmare, particularly in instances such as an "agreed disposition'' – similar to a plea bargain in a criminal trial – where a person may have been pushed to waive his right to appeal (pdf) during negotiations.
No one knows for sure how many sex offenders there are in the US, but well over 747,000 people are listed on registries. Some are, indeed, pedophiles, but one third of offenders have committed their crime as children. The recidivism rate for sex offenders in general is low, with government statistics showing the rate at around 5%, versus 60% for all criminal activity.
The topic, especially with the Ariel Castro horror in Cleveland fresh in everybody's minds, is charged with emotion. There is little regard for sex offenders in the justice system: defense lawyers are loath to take a case before a jury, fearing instant conviction, and judges often can barely hide their disgust should they render a decision at a bench trial.
So, the Virginia case of a young gay college student named Galen Baughman is all the more remarkable. Baughman gambled with his future when he decided to take his case before a Virginia jury. Yet, amazingly, he won.
Baughman had been a college student in the early 2000s at the University of Indiana, studying to become an opera singer. He was sentenced in a Virginia court in 2004 to 30 years in prison for "aggravated sexual battery" and sex with a minor (aged 13-15), after having been charged initially with soliciting sex over the internet and disseminating indecent materials to minors. Baughman claimed the sexual encounters were not forced.
The judge suspended part of the sentence; even so, Baughman spent nine years in prison – half of that time in one sort of segregation or another, despite serving his sentence without any infraction.
In 2007, just as he was looking forward to release, Virginia officials unexpectedly informed Baughman that they believed he might qualify for civil commitment. In June 2009, Virginia authorities decided this was indeed the case. Without filing any additional charges, they held him in prison for a further 25 months in order to assess his behavior.
One day, a psychologist arrived at the prison, and said he wanted to interview Baughman to determine whether he was a sexually violent predator. Baughman said he would be glad to answer questions but wanted an attorney present. At that, the psychologist left, never to return.
Baughman's two attorneys, Charles Burnham and Eugene Gorokhov of Washington, DC, asked the state to conduct an evaluation with Baughman and one of his attorneys present. Virginia refused, and as Baughman's subsequent habeas petition claimed, "took the position that the request for counsel constituted a refusal to participate, and indicated that it was contrary to office policy to conduct an evaluation if the respondent first sought advice of counsel". The state court agreed.
Then, on 9 October 2009, Virginia initiated formal proceedings against Baughman. All along, Baughman had sought to introduce testimony from his own expert witness: a Johns Hopkins medical doctor and an acknowledged expert in sex offense matters, who has consulted with the FBI, testified before the US Senate, been a member of the White House conference on sexual disorders, and worked with the Boston archdiocese on pedophilia cases.
Under civil commitment, the state can hold a person for an undetermined length of time until its therapy works to the satisfaction of law enforcement agents. His doctor's report, made available to me by Baughman and his attorneys, concluded with an assessment that despite past actions:
[Baughman] has no condition which makes him likely to engage in 'sexually violent' acts. Therefore, in my professional opinion, he does not meet the statutory requirements for civil commitment as a 'sexually violent predator'.
At the subsequent trial, the judge refused to allow the expert's evaluation to be entered in Baughman's defense, instead relying wholly on the state's own expert's report. This was based on written evaluations made years ago.
In the end, a jury of six women and one man found Baughman not likely to be a sexually violent predator. After listening to the state's prosecutor describe what Baughman might do if let out of jail, one perplexed juror was reported to have asked: "But what's the crime?"
Baughman is thus believed to be the first person in Virginia ever to win such a civil commitment jury trial, and one of the few nationally. He was released on probation, and subject to the state's policy that relies on polygraphs, therapy sessions, and a process called the "containment model".
The therapy is unusual in that Baughman believes the therapist functioned as a sort of surrogate cop. As he put it:
It is absolutely the case that everything I say to my therapist ends up on my probation officer's desk – which means it also ends up on the prosecutor's desk.
Baughman sought to re-enter the University of Indiana, but was blocked by the state of Virginia. The school eventually reversed the decision, but Baughman then found himself blocked by the state of Indiana.
So, he is stuck in Virginia. He does not drive a car because he fears any cop who runs his plate will notice he is on the sex offender registry and look for a reason to pull him over, if only to harass him. Even a simple traffic ticket leads him to worry whether the encounter could turn into a violation that would land him back in prison.
Baughman's parole officer, at least, has been generally supportive of his charge, even moving away from containment model therapy. Still, many would find the terms of Baughman's probation over the top. He has been asked by Virginia sex inspectors, who are employed to enforce sex offender treatment, how many times a day he masturbates and what he thinks about when he masturbates, along with the details of actual sexual activities. Baughman says, "As part of that program, I was required to disclose this information to them." The state probation officers declined to discuss Baughman's case with me.
Baughman faces six more years on probation. He had studied to be an opera singer, but like so many sex offenders, he has little chance of obtaining meaningful employment. He has come to see no future for himself in the US. Instead, he might go to Europe, maybe France, to obtain actual freedom and intimate liberty.
His probation conditions may be restrictive and intrusive, but Baughman is lucky to have two aggressive attorneys fighting in his corner. Most accused sex offenders are simply told to plea-bargain their way into civil commitment. Once under civil commitment, they may spend the rest of their lives in prison.
While there are, undoubtedly, some irremediable sex offenders who need to be confined for reasons of public safety, the civil commitment protocol denies some of the basic rights afforded other criminal defendants. These include the right to a speedy trial, full right to counsel and, perhaps most importantly, the right to introduce testimony from a defendant's own experts. Without the protection of this last right, some defendants are sent off to prison for an indefinite sentence on the basis of questionable opinions from the state's expert witnesses.
Civil commitment for sex offenders needs to be reformed root-and-branch or abandoned. The policy may be popular in law enforcement circles, fewer than half of US states have such laws. But in those states that have it, Baughman is the rare exception; most do not escape this largely invisible American gulag.

Judge's Guide: Prof. David Lisak

Here is one of the Papers MSOP's Punk Thugs jacked from me when they brutally physically and sexually assaulted me on 12/27/06, while current MSOP Director Nancy Johnston was the Site Director at MSOP-STP:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/JudgesGuide_Lisak0001.pdf

Here's a letter from a "Patient" describing his Staff Assault on him while in handcuffs, which I witnessed on the South Unit MSOP under Nancy Johnston and CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER GARY GRIMM's (MSOP PROGRAM MANAGER) idea of WORLD CLASS "Care and Treatment":

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/Kartwright%20Letter0001.pdf

These are just two documents of my entire defense files they stole from me and kept for months and then only returned half of the materials. MSDOP kept all the most damning documents/evidence I had amassed.

Some of these actions give rise to my Complaint vs the MSOP (and Nancy) in Federal Court:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/20130725_EVENSTAD_AMENDED_COMPLAINT_FILED.pdf

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Task Force Mtg: 9/26/13














The Following Blog Post & Accompanying Notes are from someone (Thomas Wayne Evenstad) HCAO John Kirwin alleged is a severely mentally disordered "sex offender"--A"Proposed Patient".  Think about that before you even think about suggesting that the State has been responsible in identifying the highest risk. That is a sick joke. 

Just go the DOC Website's Level 3 List in the community/on the streets, and you will see that John Kirwin, Mark Ostrem, and the rest of the COUNTY ATTORNEYS AS WELL THE LAWYERS FROM THE AGO ASSIGNED TO THESE CASES HAVE ALL GROSSLY ABUSED THEIR DISCRETION AND BETWEEN THEM AND TOM ROY/BILL DONNAY'S CRACK CREW IN THE DOC RISK ASSESSMENT, THEY HAVE DEMONSTRATED INCOMPETENCE, POOR JUDGMENT, POOR IMPULSE CONTROL IN RESISTING PETITIONING LOW RISK SEX OFFENDERS LIKE  BRAD STEVENS, JOSHUA COX, ORLANDO LINDGREN, ADAM MEYER, TIM LINCOLN, AND 500+ POLITICAL PRISONERS IN MSOP.


The Task Force tonight spent a considerable amount of time tonight engaged in discussing which is the lesser of two evils: County Attorneys having the authority to push forward petitions, even if a "Screening Panel" recommends against commitment, or the Attorney General's Office. 

The Task Force fundamentally misunderstands that you can trust neither to do what is Constitutional, Ethical or Legal. John Kirwin himself told the Minnesota Supreme Court in Oral Argument in the Linehan Case 20+ years ago that it WAS THE COURT'S DUTY TO REIGN IN OVERZEALOUS, UNETHICAL PROSECUTORS LIKE HIM AND ALL THE REST OF THEM AT THE DA LEVEL OR AGO IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. THEY ARE ALL CORRUPT AND HAVE ABUSED THE STATUTES TO THE POINT THAT WE ARE HERE NOW. 

THE COURTS ARE EVEN MORE RESPONSIBLE, AS AFTER KIRWIN CHALLENGED THEM 20 years ago, THEY HAVE NOT HAD THE COLLECTIVE CHARACTER OR INTEGRITY TO UPHOLD THEIR OATHS. THEY HAVE PANDERED TO JOHN KIRWIN, MATTHEW FRANK, AND THE REST OF THEM. 


THE DEFINITION OF INSANITY IS REPEATING THE SAME BEHAVIOR YET EXPECTING DIFFERENT RESULTS. THIS IS WHAT THE TASK FORCE IS DOING BY RELYING ON THE LIKES OF KIRWIN AND OSTREM (Who actually stated tonight that HE SEES NO PROBLEMS WITH THE WAY THE CURRENT SEX CIVIL COMMITMENT SCREENING PROCESS IS CONDUCTED. HALF THE ROOM LAUGHED OUT LOUD AT THAT ASININE  COMMENT, INCLUDING THE SEX CIVIL COMMITMENT PROSECUTORS FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY (Kirwin/Couri) seated behind me in my and my Dad's usual location.

"Mr. Kirwin" provided the Task Force the Florida Report https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/FL_9.23.13_Rpt/09.23_SVPP_Report.pdf        showing that alleged SVP-Risk Sex Offenders have a re-offense rate from 4-10%, in line what I've been saying for about ten years now.




DONNA DUNN, THE VICTIM ADVOCATE SAID IT BEST. SHE SAID SEXUAL ABUSE/ASSAULT VICTIMS DON'T WANT REVENGE WITH PUNITIVE LIFE SENTENCES TO MSOP.

SHE SAID THAT THE COUNTY ATTORNEYS, THE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE, THE DISTRICT COURTS, AND THE APPELLATE COURTS HAVE ALL DONE A SHAMEFUL DISSERVICE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, TO THE MSOP "CLIENT-PATIENTS" (HosPrisoners) AND TO THE VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ABUSE/ASSAULT THEMSELVES!

SHE SAID OUT LOUD IN PUBLIC WHAT I'VE SAID SINCE DISCOVERING THIS SORDID, ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL SDP/SPP GANG GOVERNOR TIMOTHY PAWLENTY, JOHN KIRWIN,  MARK OSTREM AND OTHER POWERFUL "STAKEHOLDERS" SET UP FOLLOWING BILL DONNAY, DWIGHT CLOSE, THERESA LEVERENTZ, & THE REST OF TOM ROY'S "WORLD CLASS" Risk Assessors DECISION TO LET ALFONSO RODRIGUEZ OUT TO ABDUCT, RAPE, TORTURE AND MURDER DRU SJODIN.

I CALLED THIS OUT IN MY MAYBE 2 MINUTES CHAIR MAGNUSON GENEROUSLY ALLOWS ME EVERY MEETING I ATTEND.

I HIT 3 POINTS:
1. Use Out-Of-State Risk Assessors to be the Check and Balance so desperately needed. (Not enough time to also inform them that are getting in the intake too late...They MUST review DOC POLICIES RE MSOP REFERRAL AND REVERSE THE POLICIES TO PRE-SJODIN RE RISK THRESHOLDS TO EVEN MERIT CONSIDERATION) ALSO, HOLD HEARING CHANGE BURDEN FROM PREPONDERANCE TO AT LEAST CLEAR AND CONVINCING AND IDEALLY TO THE CRIMINAL PROTECTION OF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT TO EVEN HOLD)
2. I told the Task Force (And SCAP Chief Judge JoAnne Smith and Senior Judge Kathleen Gearin) of the State's appalling efforts to "WIN" THE STEVENS' CASE BY LYING & MISREPRESENTING TO THE SCAP STEVENS IS A STRANGER RAPIST, AND MSOP WOULD HAVE NO INVOLVEMENT WITH A DISCHARGED "CLIENT-PATIENT". DESPICABLE LIES.
3. MN GOVT (#mnleg Lol) is On Record stating the purpose of the SDFP/SPP Schemes and MSOP is for "Sending sex offenders who have completed their prison terms to secure facilities for the rest of their lives": https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/MN.LegOnRecord_LifeSentence0001.pdf

Vice-Chair James Rosenbaum is to be COMMENDED FOR HIS JUDICIAL INTEGRITY, HIS COURAGE, AND HIS LEADERSHIP FOR HIS CONCLUSIONS REGARDING THE FUTURE IN MINNESOTA OF [SVP] "CIVIL" COMMITMENT.

JUDGE GEARIN's EXPRESSED RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION AND "Outrage" as she called it over the lack of discharges and the State's unethical conduct would have more effect if she would show the same courage and leadership her colleague James Rosenbaum is showing and START DISCHARGING THE POLITICAL PRISONERS OF THE MSOP POPULATION.

PLEASE JUDGES GEARIN AND SMITH, START DISCHARGING "CLIENT-PATIENTS"!

GOVERNOR DAYTON REPEAL T-PAW's EXECUTIVE ORDER PLEASE!!!

THE SCAP JUDGES DESERVE BETTER AND YOU SHOWING A LITTLE LEADERSHIP FOR A CHANGE VS ENABLING THIS SEVERE HUMAN RIGHTS CRISIS WOULD BE HELPFUL.

YOUR BEHAVIOR, GOVERNOR MARK DAYTON IS APPALLING IN THIS AREA AND YOU WOULD BE WISE TO ABANDON YOUR PROPPING UP OF THIS PROGRAM BEFORE 700+ Men Sue you also, which I recommend wholeheartedly they do.

YOU NEED TO MAN UP GOVERNOR AND REPEAL PAWLENTY'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL/ILLEGAL ORDER.

QUIT BEING A POLITICAL WHORE!!!

SPEAKING OF ATTENDANCE, IT WAS DEPLORABLE. HALF THE "Task Force" HAS DROPPED OUT OF THESE MEETINGS. NO SIGN OF JUDGE NELSON, WHO TOOK MY ADVICE: STAY HOME. YOUR SLEEPING IN THE MEETINGS YOU'RE AT AND YOU COMMITTED EVERY MAN WHO APPEARED BEFORE YOU. YOU STATED 700 IS A SMALL NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN MSOP. WE GET YOUR IDEA OF JUSTICE.

HARRINGTON DIDN'T BOTHER TO SHOW.

TONY LOURY NO SHOW. WHERE WAS LOURY'S "BOLD LEGISLATION" HE PROMISED THE FAMILIES???

JIM ABELER. NO SHOW AGAIN. LIED IN PUBLIC ABOUT WRITING BILL TO MOVE ALL DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED...ABOUT 100 people TO LESS RESTRICTIVE ALTERNATIVES.

DR. KAPLAN NOT THERE TONIGHT BUT HE HAS BEEN VERY RESPONSIBLE WITH HIS ATTENDENCE, AS HAS HEAD SHERIFF JIM FRANKLIN. I LIKE AND RESPECT EACH OF THEM, AS WELL AS DOC COMMISSIONER TOM ROY WHO WAS ABSENT BUT BEEN AT EVERY OTHER MEETING I RECALL AS DR. KAPLAN AND SHERIFF FRANKLIN HAVE.

10 1/2 years after I identified the Problem (and the Solution), they have finally proposed legislation to address the "Deadly Gap" as I've dubbed it of the actually DANGEROUS HIGHEST SEX OFFENDERS (LIKE RODRIGUEZ) would be subject to much longer Monitoring/Supervision in the Community, which I proposed to Governor Pawlenty, The BCA, Sheriff Stanek, Patty Wetterling, and many other State and National figures.

They proposed 25-Year Conditional Release periods vs 10, but fail to recognize or understand that REPEAT SEX OFFENDERS ARE SUBJECT TO LIFETIME CONDITIONAL RELEASE NOW. I still believe that voluntary or involuntary GPS TRACKING FOR LIFE IS THE ROUTE TO GO FOR THE TRUE WORST OF THE WORST, WHICH CURRENT STATE OFFICIALS HAVE PROVEN THEMSELVES INCOMPETENT AND UNABLE TO IDENTIFY CORRECTLY.
THIS IS PART OF WHY I CONTINUED TONIGHT TO URGE THIS PANEL TO TAKE UP THE OFFER OF MY COLLEAGUES ON THE SOCDA LISTSERVE I AM ON WITH I BELIEVE DEAN JANUS AND ABOUT 500 of the top SVP PEOPLE IN THE NATION ON THE FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH SIDE AND THE DEFENDING OF THESE EXTREMELY COMPLICATED CASES.

I TOLD THIS TASK FORCE AND DHS COMMISSION JESSON A YEAR AGO THAT THERE ARE 7 OUT-OF-STATE NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED EXPERTS (Psychologists experienced with SVP RISK ASSESSMENTS) FROM OUR NEIGHBORING STATES.

MN STATE OFFICIALS ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED WITH SEX CIVIL COMMITMENT DECISIONS!!!

IT'S THAT SIMPLE.

SANITY, NOT INSANITY.

USE THESE 7 EXPERTS IN 2 Panels of 3 with one alternate. I would recommend to either make it unanimous or 2-1 for commitment with these REAL EXPERTS, AND OUR SYSTEM WILL BE MORE FAIR AND MUCH IMPROVED.

VICE CHAIR JAMES ROSENBAUM'S RECOMMENDATION IS IDENTICAL TO MY RECOMMENDATION I'VE HAD SINCE 2004: DISPENSE WITH SEXUAL CIVIL COMMITMENT IN MINNESOTA!!! THIS IS AN EXTREMELY CRUCIAL RECOMMENDATION!!!


James Rosenbaum has more legal experience than anyone on this Task Force, Fred Friedman included, who is no spring chicken and could reasonably be described as a seasoned, veteran defense lawyer with probably 25 years under his belt post law school.

Vice Chair Rosenbaum gets it. He's able to see the big picture: The Constitutional implications, the proven impossibility to date of any one of 20 States to provide constitutionally adequate treatment and discharge patients who have been effectively treated...the enormous financial and human costs. Judge Rosenbaum was a Judge in the Holly v Konieska Case. He knows MSOP abuses "Clients". MSOP Staff and Senior Officials called Elliot Holly racial epithets, refused to feed him or even give him Toliet Paper, Clean clothes, showers or exercise while they had him on Ad-Seg for months:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/Holly%20Second_Amended_Complaint.pdf

 DHS/MSOP Staff and Officials are very sick people who are need of being replaced. Nancy Johnston is extremely cruel and DHSuffering is no better. "World Class" "Care & McTreatment"

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

#mnleg On Record Life Sentence, Not "Treatment"

The Minnesota Government is On Record stating the purpose of their Sex Offender Witch Hunt ("Crackdown") was for "Sending sex offenders who have completed their prison terms to secure facilities for the rest of their lives if they are not deemed to be a threat to society." (Typo left)

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/MN.LegOnRecord_LifeSentence0001.pdf

I just uncovered an important piece of evidence in which the State is on Record stating in this Press Release the true motivation behind the MSOP, and it's purpose for existing and being funded (despite the transparent fa├žade/guise that "Treatment" is the purpose) and that the State is acting in Good Faith in that the "Civil" Commitment Statutes are primarily Remedial, and not Punitive. That is just to give the corrupt courts an excuse to reject Substantive Due Process challenges.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/MN.LegOnRecord_LifeSentence0001.pdf

http://msopgulag.blogspot.com/2013/09/mnleg-on-record-life-sentence-not.html

WHEN YOU COMBINE THIS EVIDENCE WITH ALL THE REST AND THEN ADD DEAN MOONEY'S INTERNAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA'S DIRTIEST LITTLE SECRET:

http://msopgulag.blogspot.com/2013/01/a-damning-essay.html, it begins to look as though the cowardly, corrupt MN Supreme Court, which has enabled this abomination for 20+ years will finally have to reverse the 4-3 decisions from a generation ago that MSOP is Treatment, not PUNISHMENT, which should have happened within a few years of the State abusing their Police Power.  

St. Peter Police: Criminals in Blue

Here is my letter to Chief Peters of the Saint Peter Police Department. This Criminal won't Protect or Serve MSOP "Client-Patients" (HosPrisoners):

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/St.%20Peter%20PD.10.14.060001.pdf

Saturday, September 21, 2013

FL Reacts To Hi-Profile Tragedy

http://miami.cbslocal.com/2013/09/24/fla-legislature-could-crack-down-on-sexually-violent-predators/

http://news.wfsu.org/term/sexually-violent-predator-program


http://www.wctv.tv/news/headlines/Strengthening-Floridas-Sexually-Violent-Predator-Program-225132732.html?ref=732

http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2013-09-23/news/fl-sex-predator-hearings-20130922_1_cherish-perrywinkle-jimmy-ryce-predator

Here is the Internal State Report provided to me by a colleague in Florida:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/FL_9.23.13_Rpt/09.23_SVPP_Report.pdf


http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/broward/fl-sex-predator-program-changes-20130922,0,4557681.story

Excerpt:
An eight-month Sun Sentinel investigation published in August found nearly 1,400 sex offenders reviewed under the law had been re-arrested on sex charges in Florida. The state has screened a total of more than 31,000 offenders.
The review team said that represented a reoffense rate of just 4 percent.

The reviewers also examined a state study and the program's own research on predators who were recommended for confinement but later released. The reoffense rates ranged from 4 to 10 percent.

Those rates are surprisingly low for "a group thought to be extremely dangerous sexual predators,'' the report said.

Friday, September 20, 2013

MSOP Director: Nancy Johnston

Nancy and I go way back. Check out the 9/22/06 letter I sent her from the bowels of the Fear-Based Stress Box, under inhuman suffering from the Minnesota Department of Human Suffering (DHS)/MSOPrison:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/Nancy%20Johnston%20Ltr9.22.060001.pdf

Nancy never lifted a finger for me or any other MSOP "Client-Patient". She reigned from afar. You never saw Nancy. One cameo at the HRB where she did what she does best: Lie to your face. She told the HRB that her sadistic Treatment Plans she Ordered and had implemented against me weren't Treatment Plans:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/HRB_12.15.060001.pdf

DOES THIS SADISTIC "INDIVIDUAL PROGRAM PLAN METHOD'' NOT LOOK LIKE A TX PLAN, ALBEIT MSOP STYLE: BRAINWASHING, CONTROL, LIMITING ACCESS TO COMPLAIN ABOUT ABUSE, MALTREATMENT, NEGLECT, ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL SUMMARY PUNISHMENT AND NO OVERSIGHT WHATSOEVER OF THIS "PROGRAM". NONE. NOT BY THE COURTS, NOT LAW ENFORCEMENT, CERTAINLY NOT ROBERTA OPHEIM's COWARDLY CREW...NO ONE. TRULY SCARY:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/1.23.07%20IPPM0001.pdf

HERE IS THE STATE INVESTIGATORS REPORT AFTER I TOLD ON NANCY FOR ILLEGALLY AND UNCONSTITUTIONALLY HAVING ME PUT IN PROTECTIVE ISOLATION ON FOUR (4) SEPERATE OCCASIONS FOR FOLLOWING MSOP POLICIES/PROCEEDURES/RULES/REGULATIONS:

 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/Correction%20Order%203.7.070001.pdf

Game, Set, Checkmate, Etc. Nancy, as I withstood all you could muster to break me and punish me.

Thanks for Playing.

MSOP DIRECTOR JOHNSTON told me right to my face that as long as she was the MSOP Site Director, no "Patient" would ever be allowed a private, unmonitored call to their civil commitment attorney(s).

Lucinda Jesson and Anne Barry promoted Nancy to MSOP Director, just as Convicted Sex Offender Gary Grimm "retires".

It's nearly our 7th Annivesary since my heartfelt plea to you to stop punishing me for no just cause.

Happy Anniversary Nancy
.
My offer is still open to you, Lucinda Jesson and Anne Barry. I can make that place much safer fast.

I can also implement a successful treatment model based on Dennis Johnston & Associates Good Lives Model that builds you up and values you up as a human being vs destroying you and rubbing the "clients" nose in their past the rest of their lives. Over 2,200 Successfully Treated Sex Offenders (and one Innocent Man) with less than 10 sex offenders who ever reoffended after Dennis' therapy.

Brad Stevens SCAP Phase II

Brad Stevens Phase II 9/20/2013 

Panel 1: CJ Smith, J Asphaug, J Metzen (Ret)

Brad Ronald Stevens (Pictured):
Ryan Magnus/Jen 
State: AGO-Steve Alpert, DA: Steve Betcher/Erin 


The Following Blog Post and Accompanying Notes are from someone HCAO John Kirwin alleged is a severely mentally disordered "sex offender". Think about that before you even think about suggesting that the State has been responsible in identifying the highest risk. That is a sick joke. 

Just go the DOC Website's Level 3 List in the community/on the streets, and you will see that John Kirwin, Mark Ostrem, and the rest of the COUNTY ATTORNEYS AS WELL THE LAWYERS FROM THE AGO ASSIGNED TO THESE CASES HAVE ALL GROSSLY ABUSED THEIR DISCRETION AND BETWEEN THEM AND TOM ROY/BILL DONNAY'S CRACK CREW IN THE DOC RISK ASSESSMENT, THEY HAVE DEMONSTRATED INCOMPETENCE, POOR JUDGMENT, and extremely POOR IMPULSE CONTROL IN RESISTING PETITIONING LOW RISK SEX OFFENDERS LIKE MY CLIENTS BRAD STEVENS, AND JOSHUA COX.

NOTE I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY, BUT I HAVE A CONSULTATION BUSINESS IN WHICH BRAD STEVENS AND MR. COX' GUARDIAN AD LITEM ARE MY CLIENTS:

www.SVPConsultation.com was my Original Domain Name for my business, and The Good Lord led me to own www.MinnesotaSexOffenderProgram.com POETIC JUSTICE? ROFL...:))

I DO NOT TRY TO FILE LEGAL PLEADINGS NOR DO I PRETEND TO BE AN ATTORNEY OR TRY TO PRACTICE LAW. I'M NOT ALLOWED TO DO THAT AS I AM NOT A LAWYER.

I LIKE TO USE THE TERM OF COURTESY: Here is one online Definition:

ESQUIRE: A title applied by courtesy to officers of almost every description, to members of the bar, and others. No one is entitled to it by law, and, therefore, it confers, no distinction in law.

     2. In England, it is a title next above that of a gentleman, and below a knight. Camden reckons up four kinds of esquires, particularly regarded by the heralds: 1. The eldest sons of knights and their eldest sons, in perpetual succession. 2. The eldest sons of the younger sons of peers, and their eldest sons in like perpetual succession. 3. Esquires created by the king's letters patent, or other investiture, and their eldest sons. 4. Esquires by virtue of their office, as justices of the peace, and others who bear any office of trust under the crown.

MERRIAM-WEBSTER STATES ESQUIRE IS DEFINED AS:

3
—used as a title of courtesy usually placed in its abbreviated form after the surname <John R. Smith, Esq.>



The Task Force tonight spent a considerable amount of time tonight engaged in discussing which is the lesser of two evils: County Attorneys having the authority to push forward petitions, even if a "Screening Panel" recommends against commitment, or the Attorney General's Office. 

The Task Force fundamentally misunderstands that you can trust neither to do what is Constitutional,  Ethical, Moral, or Legal. John Kirwin himself told the Minnesota Supreme Court in Oral Argument in the Linehan Case 20+ years ago that it WAS THE COURT'S DUTY TO REIGN IN OVERZEALOUS, UNETHICAL PROSECUTORS LIKE HIM AND ALL THE REST OF THEM AT THE DA LEVEL OR AGO IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. THEY ARE ALL CORRUPT AND HAVE ABUSED THE STATUTES TO THE POINT THAT WE ARE HERE NOW. 

THE COURTS ARE EVEN MORE RESPONSIBLE, AS AFTER KIRWIN CHALLENGED THEM 20 years ago, THEY HAVE NOT HAD THE COLLECTIVE CHARACTER OR INTEGRITY TO UPHOLD THEIR OATHS. THEY HAVE PANDERED TO JOHN KIRWIN, MATTHEW FRANK, AND THE REST OF THEM. 

THE DEFINITION OF INSANITY IS REPEATING THE SAME BEHAVIOR YET EXPECTING DIFFERENT RESULTS. THIS IS WHAT THE TASK FORCE IS DOING BY RELYING ON THE LIKES OF KIRWIN AND OSTREM (Who actually stated tonight that HE SEES NO PROBLEMS WITH THE WAY THE CURRENT SEX CIVIL COMMITMENT SCREENING PROCESS IS CONDUCTED. HALF THE ROOM LAUGHED OUT LOUD AT THAT ASININE  COMMENT, INCLUDING THE SEX CIVIL COMMITMENT PROSECUTORS FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY (Kirwin/Couri) seated behind me in my and my Dad's usual location.

DONNA DUNN, THE VICTIM ADVOCATE SAID IT BEST. SHE SAID SEXUAL ABUSE/ASSAULT VICTIMS DON'T WANT REVENGE WITH PUNITIVE LIFE SENTENCES TO MSOP.

SHE SAID THAT THE COUNTY ATTORNEYS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, AND THE DISTRICT COURTS, AND APPELLATE COURTS HAVE ALL DONE A SHAMEFUL DISSERVICE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, TO THE MSOP "CLIENT-PATIENTS" (HosPrisoners) AND TO THE VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ABUSE/ASSAULT THEMSELVES! Donna Dunn couldn't have said any words that were more disparaging to the State Prosecutors and Judges.

Donna Dunn had the courage to tell them they've FAILED THE VICTIMS!!!

SHE SAID OUT LOUD IN PUBLIC WHAT I'VE SAID SINCE I DISCOVERED THIS SORDID, ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL SDP/SPP Gang GOVERNOR PAWLENTY, KIRWIN, OSTREM AND OTHER POWERFUL "STAKEHOLDERS" SET UP FOLLOWING BILL DONNAY, DWIGHT CLOSE, THERESA LEVERENTZ, & THE REST OF TOM ROY'S "WORLD CLASS" Risk Assessors WHO LET ALFONSO RODRIGUEZ OUT TO ABDUCT, RAPE, TORTURE AND MURDER DRU SJODIN.

I CALLED THIS OUT IN MY MAYBE 2 MINUTES CHAIR MAGNUSON GENEROUSLY ALLOWS ME EVERY MEETING I ATTEND.

SPEAKING OF ATTENDANCE, IT WAS DEPLORABLE. HALF THE "Task Force" HAS DROPPED OUT OF THESE MEETINGS. NO SIGN OF JUDGE NELSON, WHO TOOK MY ADVICE: STAY HOME. YOU'RE SLEEPING IN THE MEETINGS YOU'RE AT AND YOU COMMITTED EVERY MAN WHO APPEARED BEFORE YOU. YOU STATED 700 IS A SMALL NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN MSOP. WE GET YOUR IDEA OF JUSTICE.

HARRINGTON DIDN'T BOTHER TO SHOW.

TONY LOURY NO SHOW. WHERE WAS LOURY'S "BOLD LEGISLATION" HE PROMISED THE FAMILIES.

JIM ABELER. NO SHOW AGAIN. LIED IN PUBLIC ABOUT WRITING BILL TO MOVE ALL DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED...ABOUT 100 people TO LESS RESTRICTIVE ALTERNATIVES.

DR. KAPLAN NOT THERE TONIGHT BUT HE HAS BEEN VERY RESPONSIBLE WITH HIS ATTENDENCE, AS HAS HEAD SHERIFF JIM FRANKLIN. I LIKE AND RESPECT EACH OF THEM, AS WELL AS DOC COMMISSIONER TOM ROY WHO WAS ABSENT BUT BEEN AT EVERY OTHER MEETING I RECALL AS DR. KAPLAN AND SHERIFF FRANKLIN have.

AFTER 10 1/2 years, they have finally proposed legislation to address the "Deadly Gap" as I've dubbed it of the actually DANGEROUS HIGHEST SEX OFFENDERS (LIKE RODRIGUEZ) would be subject to much longer Monitoring/Supervision in the Community, which I proposed to Governor Pawlenty, The BCA, Sheriff Stanek, Patty Wetterling, and many other State and National figures on December 30, 2003:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24465959/1.30.03%20DRU_SJODIN_PREVENTABLE.pdf

They proposed 25-Year Conditional Release periods vs 10, but fail to recognize or understand that REPEAT SEX OFFENDERS ARE SUBJECT TO LIFETIME CONDITIONAL RELEASE NOW. I still believe that voluntary or involuntary GPS TRACKING FOR LIFE IS THE ROUTE TO GO FOR THE TRUE WORST OF THE WORST, WHICH CURRENT STATE OFFICIALS HAVE PROVED THEMSELVES INCOMPETENT AND UNABLE TO IDENTIFY CORRECTLY.
THIS IS PART OF WHY I CONTINUED TONIGHT TO URGE THIS PANEL TO TAKEUP THE OFFER OF MY COLLEAGUES ON THE SOCDA LISTSERVE I AM ON WITH I BELIEVE DEAN JANUS AND ABOUT 500 of the top SVP PEOPLE IN THE NATION ON THE FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH SIDE AND THE DEFENDING OF THESE EXTREMELY COMPLICATED CASES.

I TOLD THIS TASK FORCE AND DHS COMMISSION JESSON A YEAR AGO THAT THERE ARE 7 OUT-OF-STATE NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED EXPERTS (Psychologists experienced with SVP RISK ASSESSMENTS) FROM OUR NEIGHBORING IOWA (LUIS ROSELL), WISCONSIN (DIANE LYTTON), ILLINOIS (KIRK WITHERSPOON) MICHIGAN (TERRANCE CAMPBELL) FLORIDA (DEAN CAULEY), CALIFORNIA (BRIAN ABBOTT) OREGON (RICH WOLLERT)) .

 MN STATE OFFICIALS ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED WITH SEX CIVIL COMMITMENT DECISIONS! IT'S THAT SIMPLE. SANITY, NOT INSANITY.

USE THESE 7 EXPERTS IN 2 Panels of 3 with one alternate . I either make it unanimous or 2-1 for commitment with these REAL EXPERTS, AND OUR SYSTEM WILL BE MORE FAIR AND MUCH IMPROVED.


The Brad Stevens "Phase II" Hearing was very interesting. My Dad wasn't feeling up to going (he accompanied me to support Brad at the initial hearing) so I drove down there by myself
I got to the Courtroom at about 1:20 and the State proceeded to call Dr, Jennifer Jones to the witness stand. When I had previously reviewed her Risk Assessment of Brad previously, a number of errors jumped out at me and it was clear she lacked adequate training in this area of the law where mental health and the law converge...Forensic Psychology. I may or may not submit my written review of Dr. Jones' Risk Assessment(s) in this case for the Court to consider. I will have to discuss with Brad.
In person, I was struck by the young age of Ms. Jones, considering the gravity of the work she was responsible for. Indeed, it turns out from her testimony that she has only been licensed a little over a year! She conducted her Internship at MSOP, so she has no professional experience or training outside of MSOP after college. The absurdity and dangerous recklessness in having someone so "Green" doing every one of the HosPrisoner's Risk Assessments is classic MSOP. They know that no one ever gets out, so they hire a young kid fresh out of school, give her an Internship and then the Keys a year later. Her "Supervisor", Dr. Lauren Allen, looks only a few years older than Dr. Jones. Neither of these people are seasoned, experienced Risk Assessors, with the requisite educational backgrounds, training, work experience, life experience that should be required for these positions.
Dr. Jones testified that she is "not involved in Treatment." I challenge that testimony as untruthful.

Dr. Jones' Record Review was of a very limited nature. It was the negative, inculpatory information she reviewed (and focused on) as opposed to the positive, exculpatory information she ignored.
She is using a Dynamic Risk Assessment Tool called the Stable-2007, which is not to be used in SVP Civil Commitment Hearings, let alone a Discharge hearing. The literature is clear that this is in error. Dr. Jennifer Jones doesn't have anywhere near the knowledge I possess, and her erroneous use of the Stable-2007 shows this fact. There's a reason the State is using the Stable, and it's not to provide the Court a clear picture of who Brad Stevens is. Not by a long shot. More to come on that later...

The two MSOP Psychologists were asked by Dr. Gilbertson, the Court's "Independent" Examiner/Expert, whether either one of them (Dr. Jennifer Jones and/or Dr. Lauren Allen knew of ANY EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD WHICH SUGGESTS MR. STEVENS DOES NOT HAVE ANY STRANGER VICTIMS. DR. JONES IMMEDIATELY SAID TO DR. GILBERTSON, "No. I'm not aware of any.". "Supervisor" Lauren Allen didn't say a word.

I witnessed this lie (x2) and went across the Courtroom Gallery to inform Dr. Gilbertson of what Dr's Jones and Allen, Lucinda Jesson, Anne Barry, Nancy Johnston, Janine Hebert, Tom Lundquist, and all of the other Usual Suspects have perpetrated this FRAUD on THE SCAP PANEL THAT THEY NOTHING OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD TO EVEN SUGGEST STEVENS HAS NO STRANGER VICTIMS.

WELL ROBIN VUE, AND THE REST OF YOU: THERE IS GOOD REASON THE DOC STAFF CALLED ME JOHNNY COCHRAN: Here's what this False State Label is putting before the SCAP:

I have concluded an additional review of the two (2) Court Commitment Orders: Initial and Indeterminate.
At the Initial Findings of Facts at Pg. 26, it references Dr. Linderman's Finding that Brad's "Victim Pool" is "Acquaintances". At Pg. 34, it reads:

"Linderman testified that she found it significant that Stevens has not acted out against strangers with respect to lack of control."

At the Indeterminate, on Page 3 at "6.", it references that MSOP determined "at least one of [Stevens] victims is a stranger."

It goes on to state on Page 4 at "11.", it states as a Finding of Fact:

"Bruce Stewart, the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP) psychologist who was involved in Stevens' Initial Assessment testified at the Review Hearing. Stewart testified that the Risk Factor regarding one of Stevens' victims being a Stranger would not apply in Stevens' case, and that he believed that the inclusion of that as one of Stevens' Risk Factors was a mistake."

I hope this helps to firm up in the negative the very crucial issue of whether Mr. Stevens has ever had a victim which would meet the requisite St-99R criteria for being a Stranger Rape.

CC: Client: Brad Ronald Stevens, Esq.
      File

Cordially,
Thomas Evenstad
www.MinnesotaSexOffenderProgram.com
www.SVPConsultation.com
www.SportsBoxers.com
www.SupportBoxers.com

It is outrageous, shameful and tragic that Commissioner Jesson and MSOP are opposing Low Risk Sex Offender Brad Ronald Stevens, Esquire's Discharge by lying to the Court (at least by Omission) that Brad is a "Stranger" Rapist, and that MSOP is NOT RESPONSIBLE under Minn. Stat. 253b.185 Subd. 19 "Aftercare Services" for all things Supervision, and the Dire Concerns regarding the "DISSERVICE TO SEND HIM TO COMMUNITY W/o Transition" that Dr. Jones testified to is present is ameliorated by the "World Class" "Treatment" and "Reintegration" Specialists who should be scrambling right about...NOW! to ensure that Nancy (or her designee) are moving Heaven and Earth to Prepare the Way for One Sex Offender Crying In the Wilderness. Lol

Seriously, Brad and I will hold Nancy accountable on this issue. She is to submit her plan well before the next Hearing to ensure the SCAP Tribunal that Mr. Stevens' needs will indeed be met under this Subdivision which is State Law:

Subd. 19.Aftercare services.


The Minnesota sex offender program shall provide the supervision, aftercare, and case management services for a person under commitment as sexual psychopathic personalities and sexually dangerous persons discharged after July 1, 1999. The designated agency shall assist with client eligibility for public welfare benefits and will provide those services that are currently available exclusively through county government.

Prior to the date of discharge or provisional discharge of any patient committed as a sexual psychopathic personality or sexually dangerous person, the head of the treatment facility or designee shall establish a continuing plan of aftercare services for the patient, including a plan for medical and behavioral health services, financial sustainability, housing, social supports, or other assistance the patient needs. The Minnesota sex offender program shall provide case management services and shall assist the patient in finding employment, suitable shelter, and adequate medical and behavioral health services and otherwise assist in the patient's readjustment to the community.


Dr. Jones then told the 3 Judges her Decision as Factfinder:

She told the Judges that the

"STATUTORY CRITERIA IS NOT MET AS HE HASN'T COMPLETED TREATMENT"!!! Lol

I nearly busted out laughing when she said that and I saw the Judges understandably recoil.








POST IN PROGRESS


SEE MY NOTES BELOW

1:30 Jennifer Lynn Jones
Assessment Psychologist: Writes Risk Evals
Dr. Lauren Allen Head of the Risk Assessment
Not Involved in Tx
Focus on Risk Assessments for SRB
BACHELORS
MASTERS
PHD Alliant Intl University
Licensed Little over a year
Internship w MSOP
Supervisor reviewed updated report Exhibit 11
Provide SRB AND ULTIMATELY SCAP with Risk Assessments
Record Review
Tx Doc
Past
St-99r
Stable 2007
Hare PCL-20
Progress in Tx
Institution Records
Interviewed
2012 first report no interview
2013 second w interview

Wrote  her opinion before reviewing JG Rpt

What is her view on Full Discharge?

Pg 17 of 19

Nominal high risk
Needs Tx
Must be in Secured Facility

At Risk wo Tx
Explains Static-99R

Prior Scores
Reidel and Jones
5 Moderate-High
Current Opinion re Score 5

Moderate-High

Explains Stable 2007

12 on Stable
Lowest 0
Highest 24

0-3 low
4-11 mod
12+ High

PCL-R/Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised:
Dr. Jones: "Several Different Factors": DOESNT EVEN KNOW PCL-R has 2 Factors, and 4 Facets: Astounding.

AXIS I
JJ DX: Paraphilia NOS
ALC CON
COCAINE
AXIS II
PD NOS W/antisocial and narcissistic features
BEST PRACTICES-Used DSM-IV
Reviewed Gilbertson
Gil DX:  USED DSMV Pg8 Paraphilic Disorder NOS REPLACED W SPECIFIED
ACCOUNTING FOR NON CONSENT
RAPE DISORDER Paraphilic Coercive Disorder:
REJECTED BY DSM PSYCH JUNK SCIENCE: MAGNUS DOESN'T CHALLENGE! WHY? I told him at Break about the raging DSM-V controversy over this and it soundly defeated as Junk Science-Rejected by DSM-V...Magnus throwing case??? Ineffective Asst of Counsel.

ALSO WHY MAGNUS NOT CHALLENGE STRANGER OR AFTERCARE SERVICES MSOP????

Incompetent or INTENTIONALLY THROWING CASE.

THIS IS THE ATTY ON THE TASK FORCE STATING THE LAWYERING IS SUBPAR. I AM DEFENDING STEVENS DESPITE RYAN MAGNUS. WTF...FOR REAL...POOR BRAD!!!

Good thing I am looking out for Brad by Supervising his attorney's very lacking performance at the Phase II hearing. Dr. Riedel is not pleased that Ryan Magnus did not make arrangement for him to attend the hearing. He stated he would've spent his own time without even asking to be paid by the SCAP for his time if Ryan had even just arranged airfare from Florida.

Brad Stevens and I are both concerned over his lawyer's advocacy. He has over 130 men in MSOP and a very lucrative gig going, but I personally like Ryan, and simply don't understand how he missed every important point it seems for his client on 9/20/13.



ATTACK THIS WITH DSM 5 Evidence

MAGNUS
FOC Records
Never offered Tx in DOC
MADE REQUEST TO DO TX AT MSOP FROM DOC
TOLD DECISION BY DOC HAD TO DO EXPIRATION
RETURNED TO DOC W TX DIRECTIVE
REQUESTED TX NEVER OFFERED
REVIEWS? Great reports No Discipline since 2006
Considered for Stable 2007 Pg 14 of 19 Hx of non cooperation no known violations
2006 Rule Violations
15 Years No Violations
Evaluate Dynamic Risk
Fluency in reading Historical problem in this area
Strict custody
In community and in prison

5 is associated w 25.2 5 years; 10 years
High Risk/High Needs Group
Not to be used with Sex CC

Not aware of Doubling the 5-Year St99
50% by a doubling of 5 year risk estimate
Is 50% Highly Likely under the law? In re Ince 2-1  75% REQUIRED

would Tx matter w normative group
15.9 5 Years
32%
Probably Ok w discharge if Tx completed

Does Tx for Intimacy reduce risk in community: What studies back that up? No releases
Above Average
THINKING ERRORS

Hostility Toward Females

Insufficient
Deviant Sexual Preference Pg 14

Aware of challenges to at least one victim
Establishes a pattern of acting on some deviant non consent
Deviance: Rape Non-Consent

Basis for Deviant
Stable Item
Stable 2007 Scoring of 1 or more victims score in this area
Tx Participation could help him reduce
12 and above high
No opinion change if he was in
STATUTORY CRITERIA NOT MET AS HE HASN'T COMPLETED TREATMENT
DISSERVICE TO SEND HIM TO COMMUNITY W/o Transition


***STATUTE REQUIRES COMMISSIONER TO PREPARE ALL THINGS RELEASE** 253B Emailed you and Commissioner on this.

Protective Factor no major mental illness? He offended. Pathetic

Sex Offender and Chemical Dependency Tx
Imperative CD Tx
no opportunity DOC
no DOC records use of drugs
Coping
Risk Re Age
Brad is 46 or 47

DOESN'T KNOW THE RESEARCH
FIGHTS MAGNUS ON rapist less risk than child molesters
Not greatly reducing risk at 46
Doesn't change risk that he has had no chance to do Tx

Scoring appropriate in this case
PCL-r Not a great factor. It exists. Doesn't increase his risk.
Dr Reidel needs treatment
Controls over him w Full Discharge ISR
NONE ON HIM
ISR  12 months to Supervise
1 year of Outpatient Tx
Great risk to public after year of outpatient without secured Tx
Adult Females his Victim Pool
Degree of violence and gaining control
Deviant Sexual Category looks at number of victims
3 Acts of violence is 1
Several more victims to get to 2

Linderman scored St 99, not 99R
Reidel 5

SRV-Sv Doesn't meet widely accepted
Risk Assesors MN Best Practices
No Opinion Change
GILBERTSON 2:51 pm
James Harlan Gilbertson
Exhibit 13 15 pg Report September 16, 2013
Attached Addendum
Methodology: retained by commissioner for INDEPENDENT REVIEW
NO CLINICAL INTERVIEW
REVIEWED JJ & Reidel Reports and Reidel Testimony
Interview critical to belief systems, how he thinks, etc. clinical interview
Limitations w/o Interview
Responses, Impressions, how,did it enhance etc
JJ: Did not inquire into areas I'm concerned about.
DX Tools: Examined prior risk assessments, Converge of data, Discrepancies, Precision of Diagnosis
NO INDEPENDENT RATING ON ANY RISK ASSESSMENT ACTUARIALS
NO st 99r
NO STRANGER VICTIMS
+1 to 0
2-yr Questions
0 or 1
Static 3-5!!!
st99r of +3 with High Risk High Need Group

5 yr 15.8
10 24.3
Lifetime 31%

1.39% over average w 3
25.3 w 5 years
2.70 % over average w 5
Why no Full Discharge
Clinical Facts
Not LEGAL FACT FINDERS...That's JENNIFER JONES' JOB
NOT SUPPORT DISCHARGE AT THIS TIME.
STATUTORY CLINICAL FINDINGS
NOT AGREE BRAD CAN DO OUTPATIENT
RELEASED WO ISR
TX WOULD BE VOLUNTARY DISMA TRACK RECORD


JJ & JG:
HIGH RISK HIGH NEED GROUPING WAS IN ERROR
HIGHER BASE RATE

ERROR ON STATIC COULD CHANGE HIS OPINION

LOOKING AT LIFETIME RISK UNDER THE CIVIL COMMITMENT STATUTE



MNSOST 3.1 4 Years

31.6% Highly Likely? Won't answer dodges

Increased or deceased based on other factors, IE CLINICAL Judgment other ACTUARIALS


SRA-FV Reliable. Mandatory in CA

WHICH SAMPLE GROUP

STABLE 2007 Not Appropriate for SEX OFFENDER CC

SRA-FV plus St99 gives you #
Reidel scoring puzzled him

Confused whether combining with MNSOST 3.12 or St 99
And don't know if this combo has been studied.

Transcript GET COPY

PG 26-27

Not entirely clear how Reidel used SRA-FV
Commentary concerns pg 27 lengthy report
Several incomplete records No evidence of violence in either sexual assault
ZERO ON SEXUALIZED VIOLENCE
ANY EVIDENCE
STRUCK THE VICTIM HELD DOWN THREATS DURING
DISAGREE W REIDEL RE SEXUALIZED FORCE
MORE SUBJECTIVE THAN ACTUARIALS
RAISE BEYOND SIMPLE CLINICAL JUDGMENT

REIDEL  in Preselected for Tx need as a 5 is 15.9 % 31.8%
Highly Likely Based not on just ACTUARIALS
Presence of active CD

Study shows no treatment benefit

Treatment Completion no effect on risk
Termination from Tx does
Doug Epperson found
Partial Tx can help per Literature Protective Factor
JJ 1 yr of successful participation outpt Tx no risk reduction--Not Protective
Epperson vs Jennifer Jones
Expert vs Intern/Novice

No persons in MNSOST 3.21
124-134 excluded from the study
None in study under civil commitment action

does static 99 use civilly committed people
Takes issue with Reidel
NOT IN ALL CASES WHO ARE MOST DANGEROUS
BECAUSE OF LABEL!!!
Yes a different person than the released Level 3 Risk Level

5 year 9. With Static 3
19% Lifetime

That scoring would help him w lower risk tier
NEED FOR CONTINUED INPT
CAN HE DO TX GIVEN HIS LEGAL STATUS?
Points to Stewart
MSOP works from Formal Record
Work within context of 5th Amendment Rights
Could do MSOP W/O Admitting
Understands Stevens' concerns
Don't believe long term incarceration reduces him, but aging will re ST99r
Rapists highest risk  20s drops off at 35-40
St99 groups all together
Anger Rapist
Higher
High score on PCL2      27 Linderman 23 Reidel
25  is high loading of Psychopathy
Could enjoy lower because of anger rapist
PCL-R
Because of lack of treatment  records that are not here.
Capacity to adjust to open society
No DX to suggest can make it
Not Homeless
Good family support
Good work history
Capacity to return in the community in a safe way?
No
No if he is 3
Exhibit 10 Reidel
Formal Record: Extreme Violence
DX at 28:
Same DX as Reidel
No SEXUAL DEVIANCY
NO TRUE PARAPHILIA
DOES NOT HAVE PARAPHILLIC
NO PARAPHILIA NOS
SEXUAL ABUSE OF ADULT
NO SEXUAL DEVIANCY THAT WOULD QUALIFY FOR PARAPHILIA
ANTISOCIALLY INCLINED CAN CAUSE SEXUAL AGGRESSION
REIDEL NO SEXUAL VIOLENCE
1 gives you higher number, 2 higher yet
ZERO OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE
1 would bring more risk, 2 considered violent would raise risk (Needs 3 violent)
ATTITUDES, BELIEFS, ETC: CALL WITNESSES, ME OTHERS
NO SUPERVISION IF TAKEN TO EXPIRATION
DOESN'T REDUCE RISK TERMINATION
BOTTOM LINE: Not meet criteria

Inpatient Tx Y
Risk to Public Y
secured Tx Y
MSOP GOOD Y

State Rests

Magnus?
Scoring of Static99R

BRUCE STEWART MSOP STATED RECORDS ARE ERRONEOUS RE STRANGER



















Sent from my iPad